Skip to main content

About Your Invention: Introducing A New Product Or Service

Finally, the high risk alternative is to introduce something wholly new and untested. 

From talking with hundreds of prospective entrepreneurs - inventors and people with ideas for innovative new products - I realize that many people feel that this is the way to go: to invent and cash in on something the world has never seen before. 

Some people I've met seem to be addicted to building better mousetraps in the misplaced hope of getting rich.  Misplaced because the sure way to get rich isn’t with a new product or service.  It's through a sales job, but that's another story for another post.

The history of new product introductions is a history of abject failure, even new products from huge, multi-national firms that specialize in innovation.  The reality is that with a new product or service you are treading unknown ground from beginning to end, and any number of very minor occurrences along the way can trip you up and cost you everything, the most common occurrence being that there are no customers for the product or service.
 
Historically, this alternative is unbelievably expensive, with terrible odds of success.  I remember hearing a new-product development manager for a large national consumer goods marketer say that introducing a new product cost his employer around $5,000,000 and more just to test market in the Portland, Oregon, the country's 40th largest market, with but a 1 in 20 chance of breaking even.  Note he said breaking even -- not making a profit.
 
Of course, when something wholly new hits, it can hit really big, making the owners rich beyond anyone's dreams -- and we all know people with some pretty pricey dreams.  What few people consider is that very, very few of these ventures succeed.  Still, many people are attracted and even obsessed to this option, and are willing to make this investment in time and money. 

The question is -- is this the best opportunity for you?  If you really believe in your product, and can afford to lose your money, go for it.  If your idea seems completely unique, your first task, before you go any further, is to find out why.  In most cases, I’m sorry to say, someone else had a similar idea and found there is no market for what you have in mind.  So you need to know: 
  • Has someone tried to introduce a similar product or service? 
  • What happened to them? 
  • Why did their variation fail? 
  • How was their product or service like yours?  How was it different? 
  • Why do you think your version will succeed when theirs failed? 
If you decide to pursue your idea, remember that your chances of success are low and that your costs quite high.   You are likely to lose your money.  If you believe in your idea, here are some alternate strategies to risking your financial future.
  1. First, make sure your legal ducks are in order.  Have a qualified patent attorney do a patent search then file a patent if your product can be patented before you take it out on the market.
  2. Find a corporate partner to whom you can license or sell your idea.   Many large companies accept new-product submissions for consideration, and others don’t.  You will need to do some research and do a good job of selling your idea, but this could be a profitable way to make money on your idea.
  3. Another option is to prove that there is a market for what you have in mind.  This is what the big players in new-product development are up to when they test-market something.  Starting a business to test a product or service is a perfectly good approach.  The pay-off comes when you take the track record you have established for your product or service in a small, localized  market to a large company, and license the product or service to them.   Of course, if the idea really does well, you still have the option of continuing to run the company yourself.
Bear in mind at all times that new product and service introductions are very expensive with a very low success rate.  Do not follow this course unless you can afford to lose the money you have invested.  (Have I said this enough times?)
*  *  *  *  *
 
 
 
 
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lucrezia Borgia, Entrepreneur

W ho was Lucrezia Borgia?  Tradition has it that she may have poisoned her second husband, Giovanni Sforza.  Rumor of the day had it that Lucretia had incestuous relations with both her father, Rodrigo Borgia, later Pope Alexander VI, and her brother, Cesare Borgia.   What is know for certain is that Lucretia was the illegitimate daughter of Rodrigo, then a cardinal of the Catholic Church, and his mistress,  Vannozza dei Cattanei.  It is known that she was married three times, the first being annulled as never being consummated (despite her giving birth a few months after the annulment).  The second marriage ended in the death of her husband, Giovanni, and her third to  Alfonso d'Este, son of the powerful Duke of Ferrera.  This was also to be Alfonso's third marriage, which ended when Lucrezia dies ten days after she gave birth to a stillborn daughter.  She also had affairs (as did her husbands) with several political figures of the day, and even gave birth to the

Business should embrace 'boomerang employees'

Source:  themajors.net What should you do when an employee leaves. . . and later asks to return? It may be an emotional instinct to react by rejecting their request to return. But why?  If you take it as a personal rejection when an employee leaves, you may be cutting off your own nose to spite your own face. As these studies from the University of Illinois point out employees leaving then asking to return may just be offering you a big compliment to the way you do things.  Perhaps they thought they'd be better off elsewhere only to find they were well off where they started.  Not a bad message for other employees to hear if nothing else. Boomerang Employees   Organizations of all types are beginning to recognize and embrace the value of recruiting and welcoming back former or boomerang employees. From infantry soldiers to chief executives, accountants and professional basketball players, many organizations proactively recruit and rehire former employees as a way t

Consider the role of the family in career planning

Non-work orientations are related to higher career  and life satisfaction The study shows that the salaries of people who have strong non-work orientations are not negatively affected. In addition, they are happier with their career and with life in general. When planning a career, many people take non-work orientations into account, such as family, personal interests and civic engagement. Psychologists from the University of Bern (Switzerland) have found out that people who strongly consider the role of the family in career planning report more satisfaction with their career and their lives in general. Surprisingly, non-work orientations also showed no negative effects on earnings. People differ greatly in terms of how much they consider nonwork roles, such as family, personal interests and civic engagement when making career decisions and planning their career. Up until now, it was unclear how the consideration of nonwork roles affect career success and satisfaction