Research from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill documents that the man will take over, forcing you, the woman, into a secondary role. This despite the research that woman-run businesses are more likely to succeed and/or be more profitable. This applies whether it's a start-up or on the Board of the largest corporation.
There are a number of reasons why women make better entrepreneurs and women-owned and managed are more successful. According to research it seems to be because women are better at building teams, better at communication, better at considering outside factors such as civic responsibility.
Here's the research report:
Women entrepreneurs have limited
chances to lead their new businesses
Click on image
The study, published in the April issue of the American Sociological Review, comes on the heels of a recent debate about businesses with all-male boards of directors and adds to a growing body of knowledge that documents women's limited access to leadership roles in the business world.
"This work raises awareness of the conditions that limit women's access and also makes us aware of what might be done to increase the likelihood that women will attain positions of authority," said Tiantian Yang, a graduate student in the department of sociology in UNC's College of Arts and Sciences who led the study.
Yang and Howard Aldrich, Kenan Professor of Sociology and chair of the sociology department, wanted to explain gender inequality in new businesses because previous research has mostly examined the issue in established organizations. Such firms often have well-established bureaucratic procedures for hiring and promotion, whereas start-ups must build systems and structures from scratch. Their study is one of the first to explore the emergence of gender roles in new businesses.
The researchers used a nationally representative sample of 362 mixed-sex start-up teams, with 880 entrepreneurs on those teams. Aldrich said it's important to clarify that the sample includes small, everyday businesses that are still in the start-up stages, such as bakeries, gift shops, and building contractors. None of them have reached the growth potential of a Twitter or a Facebook.
- Seventy percent of the mixed-sex teams the duo studied are husband-wife teams.
The researchers found that gender inequality in entrepreneurial teams can be reduced when people adopt organizational templates such as signing a formal operating agreement and developing a business plan in the early stages of the company's founding. These mechanisms help teams evaluate men's and women's competence more equitably and make "competence" more salient.
Sign a formal ownership agreement
They found that men are 85 percent more likely than women to be in charge when team members have not signed a formal ownership agreement, but men and women have about the same chance to lead a team when that team has adopted such an agreement.
"It levels the playing field," Aldrich said. "One of the things we hope this will do is provoke a conversation so that the next time a couple or a mixed-sex team starts talking about forming a business, they can ask,
- Who should be the boss?
- Who is better at this?
- Let's talk about the basis by which we'll decide that.
Related blog posts:
* * * * *
Researching and writing this blog is becoming difficult as I read more and more research about how men and women differ in the business world. It's becoming obvious that women are much more suited to management and entrepreneurship. It's to the point that I fully expect to read a report one of these days that concludes: Men are Superfluous. Having been a man most of my life (you can't count adolescence), it's getting harder and harder to hold my head up.
Well, as Neil deGrasse Tyson once said, "The nice thing about science is that whether you believe it or not, it's true."
* * * * *
Story Source: Materials provided by University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. T. Yang, H. E. Aldrich. Who's the Boss? Explaining Gender Inequality in Entrepreneurial Teams. American Sociological Review, 2014