Skip to main content

Attention Women: Don't choose a man as a business partner

Source: madamenoire.com
If you're a woman thinking of starting a business with a male partner, think twice about it.  Why?

Research from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill documents that the man will take over, forcing you, the woman, into a secondary role.  This despite the research that woman-run businesses are more likely to succeed and/or be more profitable.  This applies whether it's a start-up or on the Board of the largest corporation.

There are a number of reasons why women make better entrepreneurs and women-owned and managed are more successful.  According to research it seems to be because women are better at building teams, better at communication, better at considering outside factors such as civic responsibility.  

Here's the research report:

Women entrepreneurs have limited 
chances to lead their new businesses
Recommended Reading
Click on image
Women who start new businesses with men have limited opportunities to move into leadership roles, according to sociologists. The research also found that when women co-found a business with their husbands, they have even fewer chances to be in charge. The study comes on the heels of a recent debate about businesses with all-male boards of directors and adds to a growing body of knowledge that documents women's limited access to leadership roles in the business world.

The study, published in the April issue of the American Sociological Review, comes on the heels of a recent debate about businesses with all-male boards of directors and adds to a growing body of knowledge that documents women's limited access to leadership roles in the business world.

"This work raises awareness of the conditions that limit women's access and also makes us aware of what might be done to increase the likelihood that women will attain positions of authority," said Tiantian Yang, a graduate student in the department of sociology in UNC's College of Arts and Sciences who led the study.

Yang and Howard Aldrich, Kenan Professor of Sociology and chair of the sociology department, wanted to explain gender inequality in new businesses because previous research has mostly examined the issue in established organizations. Such firms often have well-established bureaucratic procedures for hiring and promotion, whereas start-ups must build systems and structures from scratch. Their study is one of the first to explore the emergence of gender roles in new businesses.

The researchers used a nationally representative sample of 362 mixed-sex start-up teams, with 880 entrepreneurs on those teams. Aldrich said it's important to clarify that the sample includes small, everyday businesses that are still in the start-up stages, such as bakeries, gift shops, and building contractors. None of them have reached the growth potential of a Twitter or a Facebook.
  • Seventy percent of the mixed-sex teams the duo studied are husband-wife teams.
"Our explanation for more pronounced gender inequality in spousal teams is that when husband and wife work together, they carry with them the cultural expectations for the male breadwinner and the female homemaker roles into the business setting," said Yang. "And the more children there are at home, the more it amplifies the expectation that the woman will also take on the role of leader of the household."

The researchers found that gender inequality in entrepreneurial teams can be reduced when people adopt organizational templates such as signing a formal operating agreement and developing a business plan in the early stages of the company's founding. These mechanisms help teams evaluate men's and women's competence more equitably and make "competence" more salient.

Sign a formal ownership agreement
They found that men are 85 percent more likely than women to be in charge when team members have not signed a formal ownership agreement, but men and women have about the same chance to lead a team when that team has adopted such an agreement.

"It levels the playing field," Aldrich said. "One of the things we hope this will do is provoke a conversation so that the next time a couple or a mixed-sex team starts talking about forming a business, they can ask, 
  • Who should be the boss? 
  • Who is better at this? 
  • Let's talk about the basis by which we'll decide that.
Related blog posts:
*  *  *  *  *

Researching and writing this blog is becoming difficult as I read more and more research about how men and women differ in the business world. It's becoming obvious that women are much more suited to management and entrepreneurship.  It's to the point that  I fully expect to read a report one of these days that concludes: Men are Superfluous. Having been a man most of my life (you can't count adolescence), it's getting harder and harder to hold my head up.

Well, as Neil deGrasse Tyson once said, "The nice thing about science is that whether you believe it or not, it's true."

Sigh

*  *  *  *  *

Story Source:  Materials provided by University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. T. Yang, H. E. Aldrich. Who's the Boss? Explaining Gender Inequality in Entrepreneurial Teams. American Sociological Review, 2014

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Facts of the Small Business Survival Rate

Back thirty years ago when I first wrote about small business, a hoary and horrible statistic was bandied about, even by some of the most experienced entrepreneurial pros: "80% of new businesses fail in their first five years." 

This "statistic" has appeared in more places than you can imagine, from the leading small business magazines, books, presentations by employees of SBDCs, the SBA, SCORE, Chambers of Commerce, even professors on the college level - who should know better than to quote un-sourced numbers.  It still shows up in small-business blogs today.

For some years, I searched for a source of that statisitic.  Never found where that number came from, leading me to believe that some self-appointed expert made it up.  To quote a character from the popular television show, M*A*S*H, "Horsepucky." 

Here is the truth about the survival rate of new start up businesses in the U.S. economy from two unimpeachable sources, The Marion Ewing Kauffman Foundati…

Earn a Living Shining Shoes. . . Really

Earning a Living as a Bootblack
Can someone make a living shining shoes in today's economy?  At on time there shoe shine boys as they were called were found on street corners across the country, thousands of them.  Many were from poor families and worked to help support themselves and their families.  Today, I found three established shoe shine stands in downtown Seattle, plus two bootblacks, the traditional name of those who shine shoes, working on the streets of Seattle.

Meet George Johnson, age 74 on October 20th, a self-employed operator of a shoe shine stand in downtown Seattle's Rainier Place.  George has been shining shoes for the last sixty years, starting in Arkansas and ending up some thirty years ago at the Washington Athletic club a few blocks from his current location.
"Sixty years," I asked him the day we met.  "You ever think of retiring?"

"Gonna work until I can't do it no more," he replied.  "I don't even think about i…

Illegal Immigrants Start Legal L.L.C.'s, Create Jobs While Awaiting Deportation

The situation is a little like a story from the Twilight Zone.

Illegal immigrants can't get driving licenses, vote, or get benefits, but they are legally able to start Limited Liability Companies often creating jobs for legal U.S. Citizens.  All the while waiting to find out if they are going to be deported because they are, admittedly in most cases, in this country illegally.

It's long established that new immigrants to the U.S. are far more likely to start a business, and in so doing, create jobs often filled by U.S. citizens.  I mean, the sun rises in the East, the sky is blue, and immigrants create jobs - it's that level of certainty.

So why do certain elements in Congress,  allegedly pro-business, pro-growth, and pro-job, scream and yell about immigration as though it's a total drain on the economy?  If anything, immigration has been and will continue to be a boon to our economy, creating both wealth, new jobs and even new industries.

Here's an article from the L…